Pharmacovigilance Programme of
India
(PvPI)
for
Assuring
Drug Safety
Central Drugs Standard Control Organization,
Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family
Welfare
Government of India
in collaboration with
Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, U.P.
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India
3. Steering Committee
4. Goals and Objectives
5. Governance Structure
6. Programme Roadmap
7. Targets
8. Collaboration with World Health Organization and The Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC)
9. Programme Systems and Procedures
10. Operational Aspects
11. Functions of the Stakeholders in the Programme
12. Safety Database
13. Risk Management
14. Programme Communications
15. Monitoring Evaluation
1.
1.
Introduction
The
Pharmaceutical industry in India is valued at Rs. 90,000 Crore
and is growing at the rate of 12 14 % per annum. Exports are growing at 25 %
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) every year. The total export of Pharma
products is to the extent of Rs. 40,000 Crore. India
is now being recognized as the Global pharmacy of Generic Drugs & has
distinction of providing generic quality drugs at affordable cost. India is also
emerging rapidly as a hub of Global Clinical trials & a destination for Drug
Discovery & Development.
Further,
more & more new drugs are being
introduced into the country which include New Chemical Entities (NCE), high tech
pharma products, vaccines
as well as new dosage forms, new routes of drug administrations and new
therapeutic claims of existing drugs. This is reflected in the fact that total number
of applications received & processed have more than doubled from
around 10,000 in the Year 2005 to 22,806 in Year 2009 at CDSCO, HQ, New Delhi.
This includes increase in New Drug Applications, Global Clinical Trials, Market
Authorization of Vaccine & Biotech products from 1200
,100 ,10 in Year 2005 to 1753, 262 & 137 in the Year 2009
respectively.
Such
rapid induction of NCEs and High tech Pharma products in the market throw up the
challenges of monitoring Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) over large population
base.All medicines (pharmaceuticals and vaccines) have side effects. Some of
these side effects are known, while many are still
unknown even though that medicine has been in clinical use for several years. It
is important to monitor both the known and hitherto unknown side effects of
medicines in order to determine any new information available in relation to
their safety profile. In a vast country like India with a population of over 1.2
Billion with vast ethnic variability, different disease prevalence patterns,
practice of different systems of medicines, different socioeconomic status, it
is important to have a standardized and robust pharmacovigilance
and drug safety monitoring programme for the nation.
Collecting this information in a systematic manner and analyzing the data
to reach a meaningful conclusion on the continued use of these medicines is the
rationale to institute this program for India.
Since, there are considerable social and economic consequences of ADRs there is a need to engage health-care professionals, in a well structured programme to build synergies for monitoring ADRs. The purpose of the Pharmacovigilance Program of India is to collect, collate and analyze data to arrive at an inference to recommend regulatory interventions, besides communicating risks to healthcare professionals and the public
2.
Pharmacovigilance
Programme of India (PvPI)
|
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India |
|
Chairman |
|
Drugs
Controller General (India), New Delhi, ex- officio
|
|
Members |
|
1.
Scientific
Director, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, ex-officio 2.
Head
of Department, Pharmacology, AIIMS, ex - officio 3.
Nominee
of Director General, ICMR, ex-officio 4.
Assistant
Director General ( Extended Programme of
Immunization [ ADG(EPI)] as representative of Directorate General Health
Services 5.
Under
Secretary (Drugs Control) as representative of The Ministry of Health
& family Welfare. 6.
Nominee
of Vice Chancellor of Medical/Pharmacy University, ex-officio 7.
Nominee
of the Medical Council of India, ex-officio 8.
Nominee
of Pharmacy Council of India,
ex-officio |
|
Member
Secretary |
|
Officer-in-Charge
(New Drugs), CDSCO, New Delhi, ex-officio
|
4.1
Goal
To
ensure that the benefits of use of medicine outweighs the risks and thus
safeguard the health of the Indian population.
·
To
create awareness amongst health care professionals about the importance of
ADR reporting in India
·
To
monitor benefit-risk profile of medicines
·
Generate
independent, evidence based recommendations on the safety of medicines
·
Support the CDSCO for formulating safety related
regulatory decisions for medicines
·
Communicate
findings with all key stakeholders
·
Create
a national centre of excellence at par with global drug safety monitoring
standards
I.
Steering
Committee
II.
Strategic
Advisory Committee
Technical
support will be provided by the following committees:
I.
Signal
Review Panel
II.
Core
Training Panel
III.
Quality
Review Panel
![]() |
ADR
MONITORING CENTRES
|
|
|
|
6.
Programme Roadmap (June 2010- March 2015)
Presented
below is the roadmap for the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. The programme
will be implemented in five phases as depicted below:
|
|
7.
Targets
The
targets for each of these five phases are listed below:

8.
Collaboration with World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC)
Training
of the staff at the PvPI national coordinating
centre at IPC Ghaziabad,
the ADR Monitoring centers in medical colleges across the country
Usage of
UMCs Vigiflow software (for medicines) and Paniflow
(for vaccines) at no cost to PvPI.
Access
to Vigibase, which contains worldwide medicines
safety data
Access
to early information about potential safety hazards of medicines (worldwide
data)
Technical
collaboration for Pharmacovigilance Programme
of India
Technical
collaboration for a regular publication that will be issued by the PvPI
National Coordinating Centre for distribution to the ADR Monitoring centers
and other stakeholders.
CDSCO
Headquarters has held several meetings with UMC over the past few years to
discuss the potential role and approach for technical collaboration.
9.
Programme Systems and Procedures
The
Pharmacovigilance Centers in each Medical college
enrolled under the project will be provided technical, administrative, &
financial support by the respective Zonal /Sub Zonal Offices of CDSCO under
whose jurisdiction the respective medical Colleges fall.
Appropriate
systems and procedures will be instituted to ensure that uniform processes are
followed. These processes will largely cover the following aspects:
I.
Roles
and responsibilities of different personnel in PvPI
II.
Training
of programme personnel (including post training assessments &
certifications)
III.
Centre
management (including infrastructure, manpower, status reports)
IV.
Processing
and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions
V.
Compliance
and quality assurance in the programme
VI.
Regulatory
decision making
VII.
Communication
amongst various stakeholders
Continuous monitoring of the above mentioned processes will be done and appropriate revisions undertaken by the Pharmacovigilance Center at CDSCO, HQ.
11. Functions of the stakeholders in the Programme
|
Functions
of the Stakeholders |
|
|
PvPI
ADR Monitoring Centre in Medical College (PvPI
AMCs) |
Collection
of ADR reports
Perform
follow up with the complainant to check
completeness as per SOPs
Data
entry into Vigiflow
Reporting
to PvPI National Coordinating Centre (PvPI
NCC) through Vigiflow with the source data
(original) attached with each ADR case
Training/
sensitization/ feedback to physicians through newsletters circulated by
the PvPI NCC |
|
PvPI
ADR Monitoring Centre other than medical colleges
[Corporate hospitals, autonomous institutes, Pharmaceutical industry,
public health programmes] |
Collection
of ADR reports
Perform
follow up with the complainant to check
completeness as per SOPs
Report
the data to CDSCO HQ |
|
PvPI
National Coordinating Centre (PvPI
NCC , IPC Ghaziabad) |
Preparation
of SOPs, guidance documents & training manuals
Data
collation, Cross-check completeness, Causality Assessment etc as per SOPs
Conduct
Training workshops of all enrolled centers
Publication
of Medicines Safety
Newsletter
Reporting
to CDSCO Headquarters
Analysis
of the PMS, PSUR, AEFI data received from CDSCO HQ |
|
ZONAL/Subzonal
CDSCO Offices |
Provide
procurement, financial and administrative support to ADR monitoring
centers
Report
to CDSCO HQ |
|
CDSCO,
HQ, New Delhi |
Take
appropriate regulatory decision & actions on the basis of
recommendations of PvPI NCC at IPC Ghaziabad.
Propagation
of medicine safety related decisions to stakeholders
Collaboration
with WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Center - Sweden
Provide
for budgetary provisions & administrative support to run National PvPI |
12. Safety Database
Vigiflow
software provided by WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre will be utilized as the
safety database, where all data originating from India will be maintained in a
secure and confidential manner.
13.
Risk Management
13.2 Conduct
frequent training and awareness of Pharmacovigilance:
ADR Monitoring Centers (AMCs) coordinator must organize at least
two meetings with in their areas. Expenses should be met from the
contingency fund. Coordinator should be the resource person for such meetings.
13.3 Detect
and respond to under reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions:
Periodic
sensitization of Health Care Professionals
through various modes viz posters, pamphlets, SMSes, etc. by the center
coordinator will improve AE reporting.
13.4 Ensure
quality of filled ADR forms:
The
Quality Review Panel will ensure quality of reports during their visit to AMC
and also at the PvPI National Coordinating Centre (NCC).
13.5 Proper
supervision of functioning of the centers:
A
Quality Review Panel shall visit a sample set of AMCs as defined in the SOP, at
least once a year to monitor functioning of these centers.
If functioning of the Centre is found unsatisfactory or not working as
per SOPs, an appropriate warning shall be issued. In case there is a training
requirement the same will be imparted. The report should decide the status of
the centre. If performing well, the AMC shall be given due recognition for its
achievements.
13.6 Feed
back to the Health Care Professionals:

| Communication Channel Descriptors
|
||||||
To
ensure the PvPI operates effectively and achieves
its objectives, the centre will establish key indicators to measure the
efficiency of (i) process (ii) outcome and (iii)
impact of the PvPI.
i.
Process
Indicators:
The
following indicators will be measured:
a.
Number
of ADR monitoring centers participating in the PvPI
b.
Number
of AMC personnel trained in a year
c.
Funds
budgeted for PvPI and funds spent
d.
AMC
Personnel working full-time for PvPI
ii.
Outcome
Indicators:
a.
Software
platform established
b.
Number
of ADR reports received in a year
c.
Number
of ADR reports processed in a year
d.
Number
of ADR reports submitted to Vigiflow
iii.
Impact
Indicators:
a.
Number
of signals generated and confirmed
b. Number of safety related alerts issued by CDSCO